Showing posts with label Donors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donors. Show all posts

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Donors Conference on Haiti - Statement by Brazilian Foreign Minister

Statement by Minister Celso Amorim during the International Donors’ Conference Toward a New Future for Haiti - New York, March 31, 2010

Source: Government of Brazil

Date: 31 Mar 2010

President René Préval,

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon,

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,

Former President Bill Clinton,

Brazil co-chairs this Donors' Conference with the conviction we are gathered here to make sure that the Haitian people find the path of sustainable development. This process has to be undertaken under the guidance of the Haitian government, with the support of the international community.

Brazil is confident that Haiti is capable of overcoming the present challenges and of taking full ownership of its destiny. I congratulate the Haitian Government for submitting its Action Plan. This will allow us to channel our support effectively, in accordance with its national priorities.

Two and a half months ago, on that terrible January 12, all of us watched the painful scenes of destruction and human suffering. This sense of shock may have slightly faded in the media since January. It is our duty to prove that the international community does not forget that tragedy, and that its commitment to translate solidarity into action remains alive. Maybe the 12th of January could be declared the universal date of solidarity.

The emergency phase is not over yet. As we speak, one million Haitians are homeless, living under improvised shelters. Hundreds of thousands are terrified by the threat of the approaching rainy season. Parents do not send their children to schools for fear of their security.

But our main goal today must be to assist Haitians in setting the conditions for a sustained long term development. These must ensure social justice, political stability and the full realization of human rights.

I come here today with the full backing not only of my Government, but also of Brazilian society. I can hardly remember a time when Brazilians felt such a strong sympathy towards another country and expressed this feeling so generously and effectively.

President Lula visited Haiti last month. I myself went to Haiti just ten days after the earthquake. Many Brazilian ministers and other authorities have been to Haiti, most recently the Minister of Health.

Brazil's commitment to Haiti is neither new nor circumstantial. Since January 12, Brazil has pledged and disbursed US$ 167 million in short-term humanitarian assistance. The Brazilian Air Force has operated over 130 humanitarian flights between Haiti and Brazil, which carried over 1,000 tons of humanitarian aid, including a full military campaign hospital.

I am now honored to announce that Brazil is pledging an additional amount of US$ 172 million for the long-term recovery and reconstruction of Haiti. This sum includes US$ 94.5 million for health. It also includes US$ 40 million under the Brazil-UNASUL program destined for infrastructure projects. It also includes a grant of US$ 15 million in direct budget support for the Haitian Government. This is fully consistent with our view that the Government of Haiti must be the leader of the reconstruction process.

Our challenge today is to ensure that support by the international community be sustainable and directed to long-term results. In this context, I would like to reiterate our proposal that all countries that are members of the WTO – and maybe even those that are not members of the WTO – offer duty-free, quota-free access to Haitian goods, with preferential rules of origin for a period long enough to allow for investments and sustained growth. This is a test case for the international community to show its willingness and capacity to come together in favor of a just and undisputed cause. Helping Haiti is beyond any ideological, religious or political struggle.

This is really a historical occasion. We have the opportunity to pay respect to what the Haitians' struggle symbolizes: their pioneering fight for independence and the elimination of slavery in our continent. The Haitian Revolution was a major event in modern History. For the first time, African expatriates in the Americas reclaimed the promises of freedom, liberty and equality. Let us help the brave people of Haiti make these promises true.

Thank you

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Haitian Diaspora Forum at OAS - Final Recommendations on an Strategic Plan for Haiti

HAITIAN DIASPORA FORUM:
 

CONTRIBUTING TO A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT IN HAITI
 

March 21-23, 2010
 

CONSOLIDATED RECOMMENDATIONS


[DOWNLOAD THE EXTENDED DOCUMENT BELOW]

(OtherStreams Comments: For far, the best positive, proactive, and propositive approach with an actual vision of FUTURE for Haiti, seconded only by the GOH's 'Haïti Demain" Territorial Plan and by H. E. The Culture Minister's vision of future)


The Haitian Diaspora wishes to thank the Organization of American States (OAS) for convening some 400 representatives from the Haitian Diaspora in its headquarters in Washington, DC, from March 21-23, 2010, to submit recommendations to the Government of Haiti and donors ahead of the discussion to be held on March 31st, 2010 at the United Nations in New York, as part of its contribution into the elaboration of a strategic plan for the reconstruction and development of its homeland. Following are the recommendations that emanated from the two-day discussions:


URGENT HUMANITARIAN NEEDS AND EFFECTIVE DEPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN AID

The Diaspora acknowledges and supports efforts by the Government of Haiti (GOH) and the private sector to address the post-earthquake urgencies. It welcomes their insistence to the international community that, in purchasing food aid, preference be given to local producers and national suppliers in order to avoid the contraction of domestic production. It also welcomes efforts initiated with the help of the international community to assess the structural integrity of existing homes, and to implement cash for work programs.

The Diaspora would like to urge the GOH to:

R1. Collaborate with the international community to ensure that food distribution systems and shelter arrangements take into account social and cultural factors and respect the dignity of people (e.g. establish distribution schedules and community kitchens; keep lines short at distribution points; target vulnerable beneficiaries for special distribution channels including home delivery; uphold regional equity by extending distribution to areas that have welcomed the displaced population; etc.).

R2. Transform the idle time at the camps into educational opportunities and provide various trainings, including civic education for children, young adolescents and adults. At the same time, strengthen the educational infrastructure outside of Port-au-Prince including at pre-school, primary, secondary, adult, vocational, and higher educational levels. Emphasize teacher training throughout the country.

R3. Seek the coordination of distribution efforts with all stakeholders, including local governments, international aid agencies, hometown associations and community groups in Haiti and abroad. Additionally, increase transparency and accountability by requiring aid agencies to publicize a detailed accounting of funds expended in Haiti.

R4. Given the fast-approaching rainy and hurricane season, seek the collaboration of aid agencies and local Haitian organizations to identify and prepare areas outside of Port-au-Prince that are less susceptible to natural disasters. Build seismic and cyclonic resistant temporary housing, such as modular housing and prefabricated homes. In the design of long-term housing and shelter plans, adopt and enforce seismic and cyclonic resistant building codes.

R5. Increase the effectiveness of humanitarian aid by empowering aid recipients through the extension of work-for-food and cash-for-work programs within the camps and throughout the critical areas, with a focus on the youth and women. Collaborate with aid agencies to assess periodically the humanitarian needs and the effectiveness of aid distribution within and outside of Port-au-Prince, including through feedback from beneficiaries.


ENSURING A DYNAMIC AND TRANSPARENT RECONSTRUCTION PROCESS

R6. Increase accountability through greater transparency and oversight of all reconstruction funds (public or private) with the creation of an Inspector General Office. Such Office shall be required to conduct audits and investigations to prevent fraud, waste and abuse, and shall report its findings publicly.

R7. Make best efforts to ensure that firms that are contracted in Haiti hire Haitian workers and contractors as a priority, including from the Diaspora, as a means to alleviate poverty, enable job training and creation, reverse the brain drain by expanding human capital that will, in turn, attract foreign investment.

R8. Recognize the importance of the Diaspora in the Haitian economy and, referencing the Plan d’Action pour le Relèvement et le Développement National (March 2010), yield to the Diaspora’s strong request for a full voting seat in la Commission Intérimaire pour la Reconstruction d’Haïti.

R9. Create a Civil Service Corps with the participation of Haitian nationals and the Diaspora, particularly women, to assist in the building process. Donors are encouraged to review their personnel’s legal framework with the view of facilitating the transfer or detail of Creole-speaking employees to work on loan in Haiti.


ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

The Diaspora stands ready to play its part in the development of private capital vehicles for investing in Haiti such as social venture capital funds, and to bring to bear its multifaceted expertise in capital markets, technology, engineering, green energy, etc. The proposals of the Diaspora for a sustainable development are articulated around two themes: (i) greater involvement of the Diaspora and (ii) sector specific recommendations.

The Diaspora urges the GOH to:

R10. Set an ambitious but concrete and quantifiable goal for the short and medium run, particularly in terms of GDP growth (6% per year or more) and reduction of poverty.

R11. Work with donors to formally engage the Diaspora in the implementation and follow up of measures and recommendations for recovery and reconstruction. As such, create a platform for exchanging information and ensuring that (i) the Diaspora is updated on business opportunities as well as other developments and (ii) at the same time that the GOH is aware of resources available in the Diaspora (financial and human).

R12. Publicize eligibility and selection criteria for donor-funded projects and ensure greater participation of Haitian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and Diaspora investors. Moreover, create streamlined/expedited processes for business formation and license applications including a single point of entry for business proposals where investors can get responses from relevant authorities on firm timetables.

R13. Recognize dual nationality. Although the Diaspora understands that there are no legal impediments to investments, dual nationality will create greater inclusion and incentive.

R14. Increase accountability, transparency and oversight of all funds with detailed reporting through a public information system and a reformed/strengthened judicial system.

R15. Have an updated and publicly available inventory of all NGOs operating in the national territory and a mapping of their activities and their sources of funding.

R16. Promote green (solar, wind, ocean thermal and geothermal) and/or locally produced energy to achieve energy independence and security. Reduce electricity theft through wireless usage meter. Provide training opportunities to sustain a workforce prepared to install and maintain alternative energy solutions.

R17. Prioritize projects based on their contribution to decentralization, deconcentration, and the participation of women.

R18. Strengthen the role of the Investment Facilitation Center (Centre de Facilitation des Investments -CFI) and institute self-contained, automated regional branches to facilitate the establishment of corporations and investments directly outside the Port-au-Prince metropolitan area. Also, amplify the database within CFI of potential partners by sector.

R19. Create a mechanism to promote Haiti as a tourism destination even in the short term and to address all aspects of tourism security. Provide training opportunities to sustain a workforce prepared to install and maintain a thriving hospitality industry.

R20. Have a subaccount for the apparel industry within the framework of the Guarantee Fund which is currently being created. Moreover, create a mechanism to make credit readily available for the productive activities, particularly in the agricultural sector.

R21. Increase productivity by strengthening vocational training and targeting skills demanded by the market, while promoting the employment of women. This would include an assessment of available skills and needs by sector.

R22. Encourage innovation through the strengthening of intellectual property rights.

R23. Transform the rural landscape by promoting local farming to better compete with agricultural imports, by aggressively pursuing food security and promoting agro-exports and agro-industry (including vertical integration). Specifically, promote rural units of integrated production including aquaculture, livestock, light manufacturing, services, etc.

R24. Identify each region’s comparative advantage and invest accordingly. Provide for appropriate financing of development activities, particularly through the widening of the tax base.


STRENGTHENING GOVERNANCE

The Diaspora views institutional rebuilding and the consolidation of democratic governance as imperative. It believes that social justice, the rule of law, the respect of civil liberties and the protection of private property are key to creating an environment conducive to economic growth and development. 

Thus, it encourages the GOH to:

R25. Combat impunity and review immunity provisions in order to prosecute to the full extent of the law officials who have been perceived to abuse their privileges.

R26. Use the expertise of the Diaspora to continue the process of reforming the Constitution, including those provisions related to granting Dual Nationality to members of the Diaspora and facilitate enactment of new measures and legislations at the Executive and Parliamentary levels that will integrate the Haitian Diaspora in Haiti's society.

R27. Implement provisions of the Constitution with regards to decentralization.

R28. Adopt a realistic decision on the scheduling of the elections taking into consideration the special circumstances as a result of the earthquake. Collaborate with international partners and Diaspora organizations to put in place a mechanism to encourage greater participation of the Diaspora as electoral observers in all upcoming elections.

R29. Pursue the transfer of knowledge and expertise to help strengthen capacity through effective mechanisms such as (i) twinning/exchange programs with Diaspora professionals and through online communities and (ii) partnerships with academic centers for the training of civil servants.

R30. Establish an independent judiciary and accelerate the reform of Haiti’s criminal laws and procedures, including the correctional system, and increase the number of judges, prosecutors, police and corrections officers, and other court personnel.

R31. Reform the country’s justice system, and strengthen the capacity of its Ministries, including the Ministry of Justice and Public Security, to support national government institutions operating in local communities, and to develop and train a core of middle managers to assume leadership roles within their organizations.


SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS AND MITIGATION

The Diaspora believes that natural disaster management should be a long-term priority of the State. If Haiti cannot control the likelihood of natural disasters, it must manage the ensuing vulnerability and risks. 

Hence, the GOH should:

R32. Strengthen the capacity of the country to react to catastrophes and manage natural disasters through the implementation of a national emergency action plan. Particularly, implement strict building codes.

R33. Reinforce La Direction de la Protection Civile through formal training of public servants at all levels in disaster-related fields. At the same time, implement programs for disaster preparedness and simulation exercises. For example, implement a web-enabled crisis information management system to provide realtime information sharing to improve the response to disasters.


SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

C h i l d   W e l f a r e

The Diaspora believes that laws and regulations that govern child abandonment, foster care, kinship care, domestic and inter-country adoption need to be modernized. Diaspora professional social workers and specialists in child welfare models as well as legal experts stand ready to consult and partner with the Ministry of Social Affairs, particularly l’Institut du Bien-Être Social et de Recherché (Institute for Social Welfare and Research), to provide training and technical support. NGOs working with children should be required to register with the Ministry prior to having access to children, and then be monitored by a set of guidelines.

The Diaspora makes the following recommendations for short-term improvements and long-term sustainability:

R34. Adopt the Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Inter country Adoption (Hague Adoption Convention), which aims to prevent the abduction, sale or traffic of children, and prioritize the adoption of children by Haitian families in Haiti and the Diaspora. Further, work with identified partners to develop culturally congruent education and training for those wishing to care for Haitian children in order to minimize additional trauma and maximize adaptive outcomes consistent with Haitian culture and values.

R35. Support family preservation to prevent child abandonment, by offering support services to families and/or extended families to care for their own children. Moreover, phase out the orphanage system through the re-integration of children into family/extended family like settings (i.e. foster care models).

R36. Create a central database of all children in out-of-family placement, where progress and services are recorded and tracked ---modeled after best practices.

E d u c a t i o n

Members of the Diaspora who are in academia wish to collaborate with the government and the private sector to offer their services in implementing the following recommendations:

R37. Implement quality Universal Education For All (EFA) that assures equitable access to all children, including over-aged students and students with disabilities, that offers health and sports program, and civic education, that supplies second-chance education (drop-outs and youths) as well as youth mentoring and adult literacy programs, and that provides free meals (breakfast and lunch), free transportation, potable water, uniforms, and school supplies. Such education will have to be provided in schools built on the basis of safe building codes and fitted with all modern sanitation and hygiene facilities.

R38. Strengthen the certification process of teachers and administrators, and implement (i) appropriate training structures to ensure their ongoing professional development and (ii) a mentoring and exchange program between Haiti and Diaspora teachers. Similarly, implement a program of adoption of Haiti schools and students by Diaspora schools and students. Such partnership should occur also at the higher learning level, and extended through collaboration with foreign universities. Moreover, provide incentives to teachers and administrators through decent wages and reasonable benefit packages.

R39. Design school programs that utilize results-based criteria and reflect national standards. Such programs should be culturally relevant (use of Creole), promote differentiated curricula (by age and ability level), foster STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) programs, uphold technologically friendly tools and conduits (distance learning, media, internet, etc.), and support post-secondary internships for workforce readiness, as well as school readiness programming through a community approach that leads to higher education and vocational training.

R40. Address the needs of all vulnerable groups (special education, orphans/unaccompanied minors, restavek/children in domesticity, exploited children, disabled youths, etc.). Further, implement psychosocial support services.

W o m e n

Haitian women are facing specific challenges as the impact of the devastating earthquake meets the limitations of their gendered social roles. The disaster has further weakened their ability to perform their already overwhelming tasks as mother, wife, caregiver, educator, financial provider, entrepreneur and activist.

International aid and assistance, as well as the involvement of Haitian women living abroad, will be a significant determinant of recovery and growth, dignity, equal opportunity and the overall development of Haitian women during this recovery and reconstruction phase.

R41. Conduct a Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) with a direct focus on women and from a gender perspective, in order to identify specific challenges and good practices. On the basis of this Gender PDNA, allocate an equitable percentage of funding for meeting these documented needs.

R42. Encourage the Haitian government, civil society and the Diaspora to take gender issues into consideration in the conception, formulation and implementation of policies, structures and programs (affirmative action), and work with the media to support positive reinforcement of the status of women.

R43. Reinforce security in temporary shelters, food distribution centers and other environments for women and children by increasing the presence of women among security personnel, including both local and foreign troops. In particular, security personnel should be trained to recognize and gender-based violence.

R44. Adopt and implement a zero tolerance policy towards violence against women and children and implement the necessary measures to make this policy operational, including detention and prosecution of alleged offenders, stricter punishment relating to sexual offences against women and girls and the protection of victims and witnesses.

R45. Allow Haitian women, more particularly Haitian women living in rural communities, fair consideration and access to funding (in particular micro-credit), which will permit them to purchase land, supplies and
equipment that will strengthen their role in agriculture.

H e a l t h   D e v e l o p m e n t

The need for medical attention and care has nearly tripled as a result of the seism; and the doubling of medical infrastructure and services is indispensable to avoid a major health care crisis. 

As a result, the Haitian government needs to:

R46. Increase Haiti’s medical and health care capacities to meet the actual and future needs of the population
through a medical assistance program with the Haitian Diaspora where Haitians from abroad will provide their services for two weeks at time on a year round basis.

R47. Foster a partnership between Diaspora and local health care professionals to provide intense and modern technology training. Particularly, offer clinical mentorship programs to build technical and practical capacity for the numerous medical students who are no longer in school.

R48. Partner with universities as well as public and private hospitals to achieve uninterrupted medical service through clinical education. Further, maintain a medical residency and fellowship, focusing on diseases that are endemic to Haiti and the Caribbean (use of current technologies where continued training and support of Haitian doctors and nurses can be done through teleconferencing).

R49. Create a “mini-fellowship” fund in infectious diseases for local doctors and nurses.

R50. Strengthen family planning, women’s reproductive health and child health organizations, health centers in conjunction with the GOH. Special attention must be given to pregnant women living in precarious conditions in temporary shelters.

R51. Create mental health clinics to address the various post-earthquake traumas to provide therapy, especially to children and other vulnerable groups. Social workers from the Diaspora can be key in addressing this issue while understanding how culturally sensitive this is.

R52. Create therapy centers for the rehabilitation of thousands of amputees and for their reintegration in society.

R53. Urge donor countries to create a program to sponsor a certain number of students (a number to be agreed upon) per accredited medical schools per year during the period of reconstruction.

Recommendations - Haitian Diaspora Forum - Expanded                                                            

OAS Web Site >

Haitian Led Reconstruction & Development

A compilation of recommendation documents from several Haitian civil society and diaspora conferences, organizations and coalitions.

March 29, 2010


EXCERPT/SUMMARY
(full document below)

Below are common strategy points as well as process guidelines that are raised in multiple documents, both for immediate relief efforts and long-term reconstruction and development efforts:


SHORT-TERM RECOVERY
  • Provide locally or regionally produced emergency food aid with coordinated and equitable distribution
    in both urban and rural areas of need.
     
  • Preparation for the imminent planting season by the procurement and purchase of tools and culturally
    appropriate seeds, as well as by providing agricultural training for displaced persons.
     
  • Support for shelter and temporary housing for internally displaced people, including adequate food,
    clean water, appropriate shelter for the rain season, medical services and psycho-social support.
     
  • Protection of human rights of especially vulnerable populations, such as women, children, displaced persons and people with disabilities, including security strategies to prevent gender based violence, documentation of human rights abuses, and provision of universal, non-discriminatory access to support and resources.

LONG-TERM RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT

  • Support for agricultural infrastructure and development including investments in: seeds and tools; reforestation; water cisterns, new wells, and irrigation systems; soil conservation; and animal husbandry to repopulate the Creole pig.
     
  • Promotion of policies that foster food sovereignty that include land reform, financial support for small farmers, rural investment, and regulation of food markets to protect the local economy.
     
  • Leadership training, capacity building, and support for civil society groups conducted in a way that promotes participation within local, national and international government structures, as well as the ability of Haiti to break its dependency on international aid.
     
  • Strengthening and investment in formal and informal education systems to build national literacy, job creation and universal access in both urban and rural areas.

PROCESS
  • Strengthened civil society participation in the design, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of all immediate and long-term reconstruction and development initiatives, both by the Haitian government and international actors. This necessitates sensitivity to language barriers and includes participation in the upcoming March 31 donor’s meeting.
     
  • Promotion of transparency and accountability among the Haitian government, NGOs and international donors that is fostered by a robust and active civil society with access to information in locally accessible languages.
     
  • Decentralization of infrastructure and resources in the long-neglected rural areas, including health, agriculture, education, water, sanitation, communications, power, housing, justice and social services.
     
  • Coordination with local, regional, international actors at all levels for reconstruction efforts, which includes aid distribution and repair of infrastructure.
 Haitian Led Reconstruction & Development                                                                   

This compilation was prepared by a Washington, D.C. based ad-hoc Haiti advocacy coalition (contributing members listed inside). Views expressed in the documents included are not endorsed by and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the coalition that prepared this document.

Haiti president Rene Preval speaks to Al Jazeera

Rene Preval, Haiti's president, has been criticised for a lack of leadership since the January 12 earthquake struck Haiti, leaving more than 230,000 people dead.

Preval is to address the International Donors Conference on Wednesday, where more than 100 countries will meet at the United Nations to develop a long-term plan for Haiti's reconstruction.

He tells Al Jazeera's Rob Reynolds that the recovery strategy for Haiti should focus on the entire country.



Mar, 29, 2010

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Making Haiti Whole

THE NEW YORK TIMES >
March 28, 2010
Editorial

Making Haiti Whole

A donors’ conference at the United Nations this Wednesday is meant to be the beginning of the long, slow birth of a new Haiti.

Representatives of the Haitian government, the United States and other nations and aid organizations will be discussing large, ambitious, farsighted plans.

Participants will be asked for lots of money: $11.5 billion to start, $34.4 billion over 10 years.

That is a large investment for a small country, but it is not all Haiti needs.

For this to succeed, the commitments made this week will need to be sustained for many years, and the rebuilding will need to clear away more than just rubble.

It will need to sweep out the old, bad ways of doing things, not only those of the infamously corrupt and hapless government, but also of aid and development agencies, whose nurturing of Haiti has been a manifest failure for more than half a century.

The good news is that even before the Jan. 12 earthquake, international donors had largely reached a consensus on what they had done wrong, and how to get Haiti right.

Their conclusions are reflected in the plans to be presented this week, with ideas like these:

TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY, EFFECTIVENESS 

No donor wants to pour more cash down a Haiti sinkhole, or to fritter it away in small-bore projects that do not accomplish much.

The plan envisions a multidonor trust fund managed by the World Bank that pools money for big projects and avoids wasteful redundancy.

The Haitian Development Authority would approve the projects; outside auditors would oversee the spending.

There also is a parallel idea, in which certain donors choose just one area to focus all their efforts — reconstructing government buildings, say, or fixing the power grid.

That promises to be an effective way to eliminate the curse of inefficiency.

HAITIAN INVOLVEMENT 

Haiti is Haiti’s problem, for Haitians to solve with the help of the rest of the world.

The rebuilding must involve genuine, not token, engagement by the Haitian government and civil society.

Previous efforts by aid organizations to entirely avoid the control — and corruption — of the government were an understandable impulse, but had the unwanted effect of undermining the effectiveness and credibility of the Haitian state.

The new plan proposes an interim recovery commission of Haitians and non-Haitians, which would eventually evolve into a Haitian Development Authority that answers to the prime minister.

If it works, Haiti might no longer have to rely on freelance charities roaming the country, doing scattershot good works that cannot be sustained.

Relief agencies have also recently been hiring thousands of Haitians to clear rubble.

The country needs much more of that strategy, in other areas like reforestation and reconstruction, to boost not just employment but also the skills of the work force.

SELF-SUFFICIENCY 

Haitians need seeds and fertilizer more than bags of charity groceries.

President Bill Clinton recently confessed that United States trade policies in his tenure did more to help rice farmers in Arkansas than those in Haiti.

Haiti now enjoys generous access to the American market, which should be continued and expanded. As many experts have pointed out, modest investments in the garment industry, and trade preferences for it, could swiftly employ many thousands of Haitians and accelerate foreign investment.

TAPPING THE DIASPORA 

Haiti does have a large, successful professional class — entrepreneurs, doctors, lawyers, teachers and administrators.

It just happens to live in Brooklyn, Miami, Boston, Canada and other places.

Many of its members are eager to go back to Haiti to help.

They could do so far more easily if their governments subsidized their salaries when they moved.

Such paid furloughs would quickly supply Haiti with people of great expertise, language skills and deep commitment to the rebuilding.

DECENTRALIZATION 

There are too many people in Port-au-Prince. Haiti needs new population centers, less congested and more vibrant.

The failure to build safe housing for earthquake survivors is a continuing tragedy; the time to start fixing it is now, far from the capital.



The paradox being confronted on Wednesday is how to rebuild a country that was never properly built in the first place.

Haiti may yet escape the crushing legacy of its tragic history, propelled by the opportunity that this latest tragedy creates.

The government of President René Préval has not inspired confidence in its handling of the relief effort, but it has a chance to shake off its inertia and show it wants to get the rebuilding right, beginning this week.

Friday, March 26, 2010

Haiti Donors Conference FAQ

Source: Haiti Donors Conference Web Site >


Frequently Asked Questions
International Donors’ Conference
Towards a New Future for Haiti

March 31, 2010, United Nations Headquarters, New York
(DRAFT)
Conference Goals
Q:  What are the goals of the Conference?
A:   The goal of the Conference is to mobilize international support and announce concrete financial commitments for Haiti’s recovery and reconstruction needs as the country begins to lay the foundation for its long-term development. 
Q:  What types of pledges of assistance are you seeking?
A:   The Conference seeks financial pledges of assistance for Haiti’s long-term recovery and development.   This is separate and apart from the humanitarian assistance so generously provided by so many donors.
Q:  How will priorities for development assistance be set?
A:   Priorities for the assistance will be set by the Government of Haiti, which will present its strategy, developed with input from the Post-Disaster Needs Assessment led by the Government with the joint support of the United Nations, World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, European Commission, and several major donors. 
Q:  How can donors be sure that pledged assistance actually reaches Haiti?
A:   The pledges will be published and assistance flows tracked through a web-based system being established by the UN with the Government of Haiti.  This represents an effort to trying to improve on past practice and provide support in a transparent and more effective way.

Conference Organization
Q:  Why are the United States and the United Nations the co-hosts of the Conference?
A:  The United States has been the largest donor to Haiti, and the United Nations has a long-established valuable role in Haiti and provides a forum to mobilize a truly global response.  It is natural that both would co-host.
Q:  What is the role of major donors mentioned in the Conference invitation?
A:  Brazil, Canada, the European Union, France, and Spain, as major supporters of Haiti, are helping to organize the Conference, and will act as Conference co-chairs.
Q:   Who is invited to the donors’ conference and at what level?
A:   All member states of the United Nations are invited and are encouraged to attend at the ministerial level.  Major international organizations are also invited as well as representatives selected to report the findings from outreach and consultation meetings held before the conference with Haitian civil society, the private sector, the Haitian diaspora, Haitian state and local government, MINUSTAH stakeholders, and international NGOs.
Q:  Will non-governmental delegations be included?
A:  While donors’ conferences are limited to governmental participation, for this Conference we have incorporated broader inclusion through pre-conference outreach and consultation meetings.   A series of preparatory consultations are being undertaken with Haitian civil society, the Haitian Diaspora, the private sector, Haitian state and local government, and non-governmental organizations in these meetings, which will report back to the Conference through representatives.  The future of Haiti will not rest on government commitments alone, but on support from a strong private sector, non-governmental organizations and civic engagement.

Non-governmental Participants
Q:  How will the Haitian people be represented?
A:  The Haitian people will be represented in three ways:  first, by their elected government officials, second by Haitian civil society representatives at the conference who will report back from the preparatory consultations, and third, through the inclusion of Haitian civil society in the conference process overall.  The Office of the UN Special Envoy to Haiti, the UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH), NGO’s, and local community groups have organized more than 125 meetings with a total of more than 1,000 Haitians living in rural and urban areas of  Haiti’s 10 departments.  A summary of the groups’ findings will be presented to the Conference by designated representatives.
Q:  How will international and Haitian NGOs participate?
A:  There will be a series of NGO events that will culminate in a meeting on March 25 in New York being organized by the Office of the UN Special Envoy to Haiti , InterAction, and the European Commission.  Representatives from this event will be asked to address the Conference on March 31.
Q: Will any other groups be represented at the Conference?
A: Yes, meetings will or have been held with citizens in Haiti through focus group discussions (March 15), with representatives of the private sector (Haiti, March 15, organized by the Inter-American Development Bank), the Haitian Diaspora (Washington, D.C., March 21-23, organized by the Organization of American States), MINUSTAH stakeholders (New York, March 23, organized by the Government of Brazil and the Government of Haiti), and Haitian state and local government (Martinique, March 23, organized by the Government of France) Two representatives from each of these meetings will be asked to address the Conference on March 31.

Conference Agenda and Format
Q:  What is the agenda?
A:  It is still being finalized, but will include introductory remarks by the co-hosts and the Government of Haiti, statements by the co-chairs, reports from the public outreach meetings, presentation of the Haitian plan for development and a response by international institutions, and then the pledging session.
Q:  Who gets to speak?
A:   Given the number of delegations expected to attend the Conference and the limits of time, only those making financial contributions for long-term recovery and reconstruction (as distinct from the humanitarian assistance that so many countries have already generously provided) will be speaking. We are asking those making pledging statements to limit their remarks to less than 3 minutes and are making available a dedicated website for delegations to share longer statements. Unfortunately, because of time restrictions, donors offering in-kind support will not be able to take the floor.
Q:  What determines speaking order?
A:  The co-hosts will determine the order.
Q:  Is the conference open to the public?
A:  The conference will be live-streamed and thus the public will be able to follow the entire proceedings.
Q:  Will there be a website?
A:  Yes, www.haiticonference.org
Q:  Are there side events?
A:  None are scheduled at this time.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Tectonic Shifts? The upcoming donors' conference for Haiti










Mark Schuller 
Haiti scholar/solidarity activist
Posted: March 24, 2010 11:48 PM 
 
(Miami) This week former Presidents Clinton and Bush are in Haiti, trying to drum up support for Haiti's reconstruction and setting the stage for the upcoming donor conference at the U.N. on March 31.

There is no shortage of needs, and even plans to address them.

Yet the process has as yet to be transparent.

I am in the Miami airport as I write this, on my way to Haiti via a conference of applied anthropologists in Mexico.

Miami is a familiar stopping off point for groups and individuals going to Haiti.

My flight happens to be next to the one to Port-au-Prince.

Striking to me is a much higher percentage of blan ¬- foreigners - waiting for their flight.

Still more striking is the type of blan: as a foreigner myself I used to be a magnet for self-assured mission groups all clad in the same bright t-shirt who still had trouble navigating foreign waters.

Given my appearance they, and many in Haiti, pegged me as one of them, as a blan misyonè.

Not today.

Most blan at this gate are equipped with I-phones or Blackberries, talking in a staccato that betrays the pace and self-absorption one would expect on the subways in Manhattan or Washington.

Development jargon of "RFPs" and "deliverables" pepper the loud conversation of mostly thirtysomethings.

They are blan devlopman or blan ONG, "development" or "NGO foreigners."

Maybe these are some of the 300 experts that are assembling Haiti's next blueprint for development.

Maybe they are just trying to plant themselves and write a proposal for their agency to get their portion of the windfall.

This world - and the hundreds of thousands of survivors still not having their daily needs met, most notably 600,000 who don't have a dry place to sleep, still - are waiting for the donor's conference at the end of this month to see who will be pledging what, for what.

Some still hold out hope that this plan will seize an opportunity and finally do right by the majority of Haitian people.

The waiting, and not participating or even knowing about the plan, is making many people nervous.

On March 16 there was a conference in the Dominican Republic to present donors with the draft Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) and the beginning of this week, UNESCO held a meeting in Paris to outline specifics.

Most people I know expect that the donors' conference hosted by the United Nations on March 31 will not be a deliberative space but a ritualistic one.

True, there is a new team in Washington.

True also, the severity of the earthquake has triggered rumblings of new thinking: even former President Bill Clinton apologized this past weekend for his promotion of subsidized rice in the 1990s that destroyed Haiti's peasant economy while being a boon for Arkansas agribusiness.

But this donor conference bears too close a resemblance to those before it, which basically rubber-stamped an assemblage of policies hurriedly culled together and imposed by international institutions.

After the 2004 coup, and after the U.S. passed the baton onto Brazil, was a conference hosted in Washington by the World Bank called in French Cadre de Coopération Intérimaire (CCI), or Interim Cooperation Framework in English.

The CCI began with a three-week "participation" period wherein 200 experts, most of them foreign, consulted large NGOs and members of "civil society," particularly leaders within the Group of 184, the bourgeois opposition to Aristide.

"Participation" also included merely an invitation letter to other groups who boycotted the process.

A network of progressive groups in Haiti published three scathing critiques of the CCI, particularly the rushed, top-down approach and the neoliberal plan that came out of it.

The donors' conference, on July 19-20, 2004, was a ritual of approval and support for the de-facto regime of U.N. retiree Gérard Latortue.

Donor groups like the U.S., E.U., U.N., IDB, and World Bank pledged $1.4 billion to rebuild Haiti torn apart by the coup, which the international community blamed solely on Aristide. 

A closer look at these pledges revealed that these agencies were "double-dipping," counting funds that they had withheld from the elected government pending resolution of the "crisis" - but still, some $900 million new funds were promised.

As of October 2005, 15 months after the conference, only 30 percent of pledged funds were released. 

The plan itself set into motion the privatization of public utilities in electricity (EDH) and the phone company (Teleco) and further pushed Haiti into neoliberal globalization in agriculture and industry.

This same ritual of rubber stamping a rushed, foreign-led, top-down process occurred with the new elected government and its first donor conference, with a little different ambiance as President Préval defended his support of Cuban doctors and Venezuela's Petro Caribé.

The World Bank's Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper was more of the same.

The most recent plan, however, did away with even the pretense of participation.

Famed British economist Paul Collier, not having even visited Haiti, proposed the same boilerplate strategies he proposed for many other countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.

This contrasts with the work that a partnership of universities called INURED is doing in Cité Soleil.

A detailed, well-conceived and executed, and ambitious plan to assess local needs in both quantitative and qualitative terms, a report called "Voices from the Shanties" voices some concerns about security and trauma that are going under the radar.

It also uncovers some practices from individual families to abuse the system by fanning out into many camps (which if neighborhood groups were organizing the distribution would be much more difficult - not to mention less likely for corruption or violence - as grassroots groups constantly point out).

Primary concerns remain sanitation - literally shit - and its health consequences in the U.N. run camps.

As almost every report from the field has shown, Haitian survivors are doing an amazing job of working together, of building solidarity, of organizing neighborhood-level committees.

This comes as no surprise to those who know the Haitian people, but apparently this knowledge seems not to trickle up to mainstream foreign media, policymakers, donors, and large NGOs.

Survivors are excluded from the process.

The U.N. cluster meetings exclude Haitian survivors and even government officials, as Reed Lindsay reported.

Meetings are held in French, a language that 90 percent of the population does not speak and cannot write.

Even progressive solidarity organizations are having conversations in English.

A network of 47 progressive groups in Haiti and other countries met to critique the exclusion of Haitian civil society from this plan, publishing a statement on March 18 signed by 26 groups.

The plan does appear to be more of the same.

Despite Clinton's apology for the rice subsidies and destroying Haiti's national production, he is as wedded as ever to the Collier Report and the reliance on Haiti's "cheap labor" in offshore apparel factories.

Lindsay reported that for all the promotion of decentralization and national production, only four percent of the funds are going to agricultural production.

The funds going through the elected government of Haiti are at an all-time low, less than one percent, at the same moment when donor groups discuss the importance of building up state capacity and systems.

Solutions are many.

My hometown of Chicago was rebuilt better than the old city following a great fire. How Chicago rose from the ashes a better city might offer lessons for my new "Second City" of Port-au-Prince.

Chicago used the opportunity to plan, employing public works master Daniel Burnham and architects Sullivan and the great Frank Lloyd Wright.

Careful thought and planning went into accommodating density, separating work and home life, and adequate space for recreation.

A document called "Haïti Demain" coming out of an inter-ministerial team of the Haitian government presents several forward-thinking proposals, the first of which is rehabilitating a network of roads that connect Haiti's provincial towns to another so that local development can be a virtuous cycle.

Other specific suggestions include a fund for local development, real decentralization and better coordination from Haiti's central government.

I do hope that a better Port-au-Prince will emerge from the rubble, a Port-au-Prince that offers running water and toilet facilities for all, regular access to electricity for all, safe neighborhoods and well-maintained streets for all. It is possible.

It will require a plan.

This planning process cannot move forward without the survivors, while their urgent needs are not yet met.

This planning process should include real participation, a tèt ansanm (coming together) of all emergent and old neighborhood groups that are pulling together for their own collective survival.

Survivors in Port-au-Prince do not need luxury hotels or casinos, for example.

The apparel industry has provided needed jobs but their high social costs - and extremely low wages - played a heavy role in creating the violent shantytowns in the first place.

Another silver lining might present itself in that many people are moving back to their hometowns in the provinces, estimated at 600,000 people.

This could present an opportunity to rebuild Haiti's national production and peasant economy, systematically ruined by neoliberalism.

In the mean time the problems that donors refer to as a lack of social capital - violence, anonymity, scale - of the crowding of the capital will have already been eased.

What's more, aid agencies, the Haitian government, and Haitian civil society alike all have stated a desire for decentralization in addition to national production that remains a stated goal of the Préval government.

As Lindsay pointed out, this discourse is not new.

The irony is not lost on Haitian people now.

There used to be a proverb said a long time ago, si peyizan pa desann mòn, moun lavil pa manje (If the peasants didn't descend the mountain, city people wouldn't eat).

This hasn't been true for quite some time.

This earthquake may have provided the opportunity to rebuild.

There is an important caveat.

Some groups have advocated the wholesale exodus of Port-au-Prince.

This is irresponsible for a couple of reasons.

First, many Port-au-Prince residents, particularly the youth in the shantytowns, grew up in Port-au-Prince. Half of the country's population is 15 or younger.

Secondly, without quick and sustainable job creation, this migration simply displaces the problem of food security into the remote rural areas, already marginalized because of communications and physical infrastructure.

Already people are moving back.

One long-term model would be to rebuild the support economy to transform crops grown by a self-sufficient peasantry.

Land reform has never been more urgent, but especially with the city cousins coming back home from Port-au-Prince, the need to create jobs processing the rice, the corn, the sugar, the mangos, the tomatoes, has never been greater.

Women's activist JoAnna plead with me in an interview: "We used to have factories that used to make tomato paste, they destroyed that. We had factories that used to make milk, they destroyed that. Well, we used to have factories that made sugar, they destroyed that."

A sugar mill formerly owned by the American agribusiness HASCO was taken over by local ownership in Léogâne, in the neighborhood of Darbonne.

This area was as close to the epicenter as Port-au-Prince.

Rebuilding it - and the tens of factories that used to produce tomato paste like just outside of Cavaillon - not to mention building new factories to transform corn into corn oil, syrup, etc. is now no longer a wistful symbol of Latin American development (ECLAC and Import Substitution Industrialization) before the wave of coups but an urgent priority.

These jobs will go to local residents who will likely spend their money on services (hopefully not those like education or health care, but that is another conversation) which should in turn energize the local economy.

In the mean time, Haiti has 565 sections communals (hamlets or villages), each with an elected "mayor" and city council. 

Plans are being drawn up for town hall meetings. 

In the mean time, $1000 can be sent to every elected government to do something that is concrete, real, and a felt priority for their neighbors, fellow church members, peasant association members, and cousins and it would only cost donors half a million dollars, less than a planning process with international experts. 

And at this level, the social control works to keep leaders honest. 

And if this doesn't work, the village wouldn't get further funding and donors are only out 1000 bucks. 

There has never been a better time - or better symbol - for the international community to support the constitutional government of Haiti, at all levels.

Agencies' end-run around it and the steady NGOization of Haiti has played a significant role in creating this disaster.

There are plans in the works for a comprehensive rural development.

Now, more than ever, they need to include real citizen participation.

Haiti has experienced several other development frameworks (e.g. Interim Cooperation Framework, Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper) that look good on paper but have been top-down, exclusionary, and have yielded little results other than official government approval for donors' plans for Haiti.

This process must include real participation in all levels - including peasants associations and local governments - in order to make this useful.

The materials must be in Haitian Creole, but it would be useful to be as simple and direct as possible.

Who sets the agenda for these planning meetings?

Can local leaders amend the pre-established agendas?

Who sets the priorities, and how?

In the context of the camps they need to be at the very least designing how the limited goods are distributed fairly in the community.

It says a lot that Haiti's survivors aren't being entrusted with this bare minimum of participation.

There are many other good ideas floating around, such as cash grants to teachers to provide free schooling to children.

Without genuine participation from the survivors, real decentralization, and respect for the elected government of Haiti, will only remain good ideas.

What is needed is a tectonic shift, a radical rupture from the neoliberal economic model and the top-down institutional process that got us here in the process.

This tectonic shift has been called for in many ways recently.

Haitian American activist and Deputy Director of Lambi Fund wrote an op-ed in the Miami Herald outlining a bottom-up strategy.

A letter to the U.N. was signed by 300 NGOs and circulated on March 18, the same day as the Haitian civil society coalition.

This Monday, a coalition of human rights groups (Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti, Zanmi Lasante/Partners in Health, RFK Memorial Center for Human Rights, and Bureau des Avocats Internationaux) testified before Inter-American Commission.

Tellingly, many of the principles are the same. They are:

  • Fix the still-urgent problem of shelter and sanitation for the hundreds of thousands of survivors in Port-au-Prince
  • Provide immediate job creation and economic development to the provinces
  • Respect for the survivors - who need to participate in the reconstruction planning process in real ways
  • Respect for the elected government of Haiti playing a coordinating role and defining the framework for NGO action
  • A focus on human rights needs to replace a profit-seeking model that has dominated development in Haiti for years
  • Build up local capacity and local expertise, including the State University of Haiti

Haiti's earthquake shook up and exposed donors' model for Haiti as the failure it was.

Hopefully there is still time to move the earth and build a new one from the ground up.

Mark Schuller is Assistant Professor of African American Studies and Anthropology at York College, the City University of New York. In addition to studying NGOs in Port-au-Prince since 2001, he is the co-editor of Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neoliberal Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction.
 

Friday, March 19, 2010

Brazil and US to support Haiti's spring planting season

Go to Original (Organization of American States) >

Brazil and the United States donate US$ 500,000 to IICA project in Haiti
March 18, 2010

The Brazilian and the U.S. Missions to the Organization of American States (OAS) announced that their governments, as a sign of their commitment to Haiti, have each donated $250,000 to support Haiti's spring planting season, which begins this March and accounts for 60 percent of Haiti's food production. The donation will be used to fund a soil preparation project to help in Haiti's most immediate and critical planting season, during the next 8 weeks.

The operation jointly funded by Brazil and the U.S. will be managed by Haiti's Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Rural Development, with the technical assistance of the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation in Agriculture (IICA).

The project will cover 6,000 hectares in the areas of Plaine du Cul de Sac, Plaine Arcahaie , Region Goavienne, Bas Plateau Central and Plaine Gonaïves, and will benefit approximately 12,000 rural families.

The IICA is the specialized agency for agriculture of the inter-American system and responds to the mandates of the OAS Member States. Its mission is to support the Member States in their pursuit of progress and prosperity in the hemisphere through the modernization of the rural sector, promotion of food security, and development of an agricultural sector that is competitive, technologically prepared, environmentally managed, and socially equitable for the people of the Americas.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

The United States and United Nations Announce the Haiti Donors' Conference

Go to Original (U.S. Department of State) > 
Washington, DC
March 4, 2010


The United States and the United Nations, in cooperation with the Government of Haiti, and with the support of Brazil, Canada, the European Union, France, and Spain will co-host a ministerial International Donors’ Conference Towards a New Future for Haiti at the United Nations in New York on March 31, 2010. The goal of the conference is to mobilize international support for the development needs of Haiti to begin to lay the foundation for Haiti’s long-term recovery.

The Government of Haiti faces enormous challenges following the devastating earthquake of January 12. Meeting these challenges will require a sustained and substantial commitment from the international community, in support of the Government and people of Haiti. At the donors’ conference, Haiti will present its vision for Haiti’s future and how international support can assist. Donor countries, international organizations, and other partners will have an opportunity to pledge resources, to coordinate in support of Haiti’s long-term recovery, and to commit to a sustained effort to support Haiti.